I want comments on this site to be intellectually stimulating and worth readers’ time. Hence, since mid-February 2011, I have put all comments under moderation and have begun exercising relatively stringent guidelines.

Unlike most other online sites, what I have here are positive guidelines, meaning that comments are disallowed unless they satisfy the guidelines in the main. On most other sites, the prevailing rule tends to be the opposite: comments are allowed unless they fall foul of guidelines.

For Yawning Bread, the guidelines are:

1. Comments must be relevant to the topic discussed in the post, or be a meaningful and natural extension of the topic. For example, this is not a space for comments with a tenuous connection to the topic, as a springboard for anyone’s pet peeve.

2. Comments need to be cogently argued, providing food for thought; they should not be reiterations of banalities. Opinions and interpretations of data should be civil, rational and within the bounds of reasonableness.

3. Where assertions of fact are made, reference should be provided to sources and these sources have to be (at least prima facie) reputable.

There are certain situations where I will cut off comment-makers:

4. When the comment-maker begins to flood the post;

5. When a handful of comment-makers engage in a to-and-fro, each trying to gain an upper hand over the other and slowly going off-topic.

* * * * *

I notice that some readers are trying to use this Comments page as a kind of general discussion board to drop notes opening new topics. Please note I will moderate them out on the ground of irrelevancy. The topic is ‘re comments’ not ‘any other comment’.

1 Response to “Re comments”


  1. 1 Chan Tat Wong 19 February 2013 at 10:19

    Subject: The White Paper
    So far the focus is on the magical number 6.9 million. Did anybody ever consider what happens when we reach this target in year 2030? Will we stop at 6.9M? Can we stop at 6.9M? If we can, why can’t we stop at 5.3M now? If we can’t, does it mean our population will keep on increasing forever? Just think of the implications. The point is, we have to address the following issue: how to sustain economic growth without having more people. We need to address this issue now. We should not pass the buck to future generations.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




For an update of the case against me, please see AGC versus me, the 2013 round.

Copyright

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 733 other followers

%d bloggers like this: