Totally inadequate punishment for taking money from foreign workers

ke_koon_sengContractor Ke Koon Seng (right, pic from the Straits Times) was fined just S$5,000 for taking money from foreign workers for giving them jobs.

This is totally insufficient. It is all the more ridiculous when the prosecution itself called for a jail term.

The Straits Times (16 Sept 2009, Kickbacks for hiring: first boss penalised) reported:

The prosecution had argued for a jail term as it said the practice of receiving kickbacks was ‘abhorrent’ because it increased the debt burden of foreign workers.

‘These foreign employees are effectively compelled to work longer to recoup the payments they have made,’ said prosecutor R. Manoj from the Ministry of Manpower (MOM).

However, District Judge Christopher Goh was not convinced, and said a jail term was not necessary while imposing the fine.

Ke had pleaded guilty last month to deducting $300 from a Bangladeshi worker’s $1,009 salary for the month of July last year as a condition for having employed him

Investigations revealed that Ke had made three earlier deductions amounting to $1,500 from the foreign worker’s monthly salary.

What the report does not say is whether he was ordered to make restitution to the worker involved. Neither do I believe that the problem was confined to one worker. That being the case, do I even think the $5,000 fine exceeded what he had earned from the illegal scheme?

At a forum held at Sinema last Sunday, following the screening of films showing the way foreign workers in Singapore and Malaysia are abused, one of the panellists said a critical factor is the way workers have to pay upfront fees of S$8,000 to S$9,000 to land a job — something that Yawning Bread has said a few times previously. These workers often have to sell the farm to raise this kind of money or borrow from loan sharks. Once in debt, they become highly vulnerable to abuse from agents and employers.

Labour agents see the fees as a honeypot. It is also widely believed that these fees are often shared with employers who hire workers. In other words, it’s quite widespread for employers to take money from workers to give them jobs, not pay them for work done.

The panellists also suggested that a huge scam might have been operating recently, where contractors bring in hundreds of workers from Bangladesh, each having paid $8,000 to $9,000, without actually having any jobs. A few months later, after holding the workers in dormitories with nothing to do, and not even adequately provided with meals and medical care for those who fell sick, the agents abandon them. Multiply $8,000 by, say, 400 workers, and you have a sum of S$3.2 million.

How do agents manage to bring in workers without having job openings? Apparently, the Ministry of Manpower has such a loose system than just about anybody can say they have jobs without being checked.

Even more ridiculous was that after these hundreds of workers were rescued from virtual internment and starvation,  they were mainly sent back to their home country, broke and in debt. Meanwhile hundreds more new workers were being brought in. Why couldn’t we have redeployed these hundreds of stranded workers, so that at least they have a way to earn back what they have paid up and suffered for? Why bring in new workers when we already have desperate workers here?

Singapore’s worker management system is heartless, unco-ordinated and, frankly, a sick  joke.

4 Responses to “Totally inadequate punishment for taking money from foreign workers”

  1. 1 yawningbread 17 September 2009 at 13:37

    I have barred a one-sentence comment that spoke of Singapore’s “tirant leader,his ass licking son and croneys”.

  2. 2 Anonymous 18 September 2009 at 00:24

    Oh well, is anyone surprised? Is there still anyone who really thinks that the word ‘justice’ means anything to Singapore judges?

  3. 3 Long 18 September 2009 at 23:08

    There ought to be more stringent government regulations for such import of foreign labour. Dishonest agents should be identified and fined/jailed heftily. A civilised nation’s growth should not come at the expense of such exploitation of helpless foreign workers.

  4. 4 KiWeTO 19 September 2009 at 00:58

    First, they abused
    the illiterate, then,
    the uneducated, weak with
    contractual informational asymmetry;
    unable, to defend

    Knowledge is power,
    in this economic world built,
    upon the efforts of all man,
    what is fair?

    Yet, those taught and literate,
    stand idly by, not caring beyond,
    their own little reality;

    Are, in their own way,
    abused by powers, incomprehensible,
    to even those, that traverse,
    the biggest corridors of power.

    Or, are we all,
    already, collected for?

    Abuse happens when good people do nothing, or are unwilling to lift a finger to help those who build our society. Too often, we observe abuse, but do nothing to alleviate nor reverse the damage, because, well, they’re not like us, or, because, just where do we start undoing wrongs?

    Is the law of economics just a monetary equivalent of the law of the jungle? Are we then, human, or beast?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: