New York day 3

Monday, 16 November 2009:

Two o’clock in the afternoon. On 8th Avenue, this guy with a clipboard and a slingbag approached me. “Do you have a moment, sir?” he asked. I stopped. In the West, I respond less defensively than I would in Singapore.

He was from Greenpeace and was canvassing for support for a proposal to build a wind farm off the coast of Long Island. In this age of global warming, anything that boosts renewable energy can’t be a bad thing. We got to talking a bit and he explained that the Massachusetts government has recently approved a wind farm off its coast, with some 80 per cent support from citizens and residents. Greenpeace in New York would like to replicate the campaign for the Long Island proposal. He had in his sling bag brochures and a petition for signing. Alas, since I wasn’t resident in New York, it didn’t make sense for me to sign.

It was a short but pleasant and informative conversation that not only touched on the wind farm idea, but also the Kyoto protocol and the upcoming conference in Copenhagen on global warming. He spoke about his group’s frustration with the US government not signing the Kyoto protocol and its foot-dragging over global warming generally. I felt rewarded for stopping and listening.

It is rare to see cause-related canvassers on Singapore streets. Non-government-endorsed causes are considered a form a dissent, and people have learnt to give up without trying. Even if you have dedicated people on the streets as canvassers, the most likely reaction you get from your target audience is flight, the moment they realise that you are there for a cause, and one that is not endorsed by the government at that. Nobody wants to be associated with “anti-government” activity.

Central Park, New York City

Government-endorsed causes (if you’d even dignify them with the word ’cause’) don’t have canvassers; instead they take the form of outdoor signs, posters and TV commercials. They take this form because canvassers would be hard to find. You see, canvassing is a labour-intensive activity; only people who are passionate about a cause would do it. Yet, once a cause is endorsed by the Singapore government, passion is given the kiss of death. Anyway, people avoid being seen in association with cheesy government-endorsed campaigns. It’s too degrading. Thus, government campaigns use TV ads and outdoor signs. No humans involved. Like the annual Courtesy campaign, where the only smiles you see are on actors’ faces.

The “canvassers” we do see in Singapore are often the ones who would hard sell you insurance or credit cards. We’ve all learnt to put up our guards the moment we spot them. But outside Singapore, you may be like me, much more relaxed about interacting with canvassers.

Six o’clock in the evening. On Madison Avenue, I spotted a supermarket. I needed a drink after walking all day, and I’m the type that don’t see the point of sitting in a cafe and paying through the nose, when a cold drink can be bought from a supermarket chiller.

Having picked a strawberry smoothie, I made my way to the checkout. The cashier was in a wheelchair and her work station had been slightly modified to suit her lower level. Hmmm… how often would you see something like this in Singapore?

My bottle scanned (US$3.95), she automatically put it in a polyethylene shopping bag.

“Oh, a bag’s not necessary,” I quickly said. ” I’m going to be drinking it right away.”

As she took the bottle out of the bag and handed it to me, she said with a big smile, “Thank you for recycling.”

How often would you hear a supermarket cashier say it so nicely in Singapore? The choice of words are not only appropriate, they serve to reinforce environmental virtue. The customer feels his waiver is deeply appreciated, but more importantly, that it adds to the collective good. He is thus motivated to do it again. Repeated many times by the cashier customer by customer, she will have gradually reinforced, single-handedly, environmental consicousness in a large number of people.

In America, the people try to change the course of the government’s and other people’s actions. In Singapore, the government attempts to social-engineer our citizens. Therein lies difference between a top-down society and a bottom-up one.

3 Responses to “New York day 3”


  1. 1 Jackson Tan 17 November 2009 at 16:49

    Interesting info about the plastic bag and recycling fact. It has never occurred to me before. I’m not involved in the sales industry, but sometimes I help out at merchandise sales for charities. I suppose I can try to adopt this practice of thanking people when they reject a plastic bag. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.

  2. 2 Kim 18 November 2009 at 04:57

    That is why living in Manhattan spoilt me for good. Nowhere else could compare. Singapore? Not in a million years!

  3. 3 Saint Splattergut 18 November 2009 at 17:13

    something about Greenpeace.
    might make you laugh if not anything else.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s





%d bloggers like this: